Overview

HÅLLBARHET, UTVÄRD. O STYRNING

Row

Publications in DiVA 2020
(fractional counts)

11

WoS coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

85 %

Scopus coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

91.2 %

Row

Notes more…

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Overall Web of Science coverage for peer reviewed publications in this unit is good, 85%.

Note that the coverage numbers for Web of Science and Scopus apply to publications in the KTH bibliometric database Bibmet. If a WoS-id or Scoupus-id from DiVA can not be matched in Bibmet, it does not count as covered.

Row

Background

The bibliometric indicators referred are based on publications registered in DiVA. Only publications from currently employed researchers at KTH are included. The rolling nature of this report means that it provides more of a current overview and less of a historic stable trend, since it excludes publications written by researchers that are no longer affiliated to KTH, but have been at some point in time.

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Row

Researchers at the unit

Publication data is available only after login.

Publications in DiVA

HÅLLBARHET, UTVÄRD. O STYRNING

Row

Fractional count

Publication volume, fractionalized

Publication volume, fractionalized

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 5.4 3.5 4.4 7.0 6.5 8.2 3.7 38.7 94.2% 1.0
Article, other NA NA 0.6 NA 0.5 0.8 0.2 2.2 53.8% 0.5
Conference paper, peer review 0.6 0.8 2.3 0.4 NA 0.4 1.5 6.1 26.6% 0.5
Conference paper, other 0.1 3.4 4.8 3.0 5.1 5.1 1.6 23.1 0.0% 0.0
Anthology (editor) NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.7 0.7 0.0% 0.0
Chapter in book 1.0 1.7 0.7 1.1 1.0 NA 0.9 6.4 0.0% 0.6
Article, book review NA 0.5 NA NA NA NA 0.5 1.0 50.0% 0.0
Report 2.4 1.7 0.5 0.3 3.0 1.2 0.8 9.9 0.0% 0.0
Doctoral thesis NA NA NA 1.0 NA NA NA 1.0 0.0% 0.0
Licentiate thesis NA NA 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 6.0 0.0% 0.0

Full count

Publication volume, full count

Publication volume, full count

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 14 12 13 26 23 23 15 126 96.0% 1
Article, other NA NA 3 NA 1 3 1 8 62.5% 1
Conference paper, peer review 3 2 6 2 NA 3 3 19 31.6% 0
Conference paper, other 1 9 11 8 12 9 2 52 0.0% 0
Anthology (editor) NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 1 0.0% 0
Chapter in book 1 2 2 4 3 NA 2 14 0.0% 1
Article, book review NA 1 NA NA NA NA 1 2 50.0% 0
Report 7 5 2 2 8 3 3 30 0.0% 0
Doctoral thesis NA NA NA 1 NA NA NA 1 0.0% 0
Licentiate thesis NA NA 1 1 2 1 1 6 0.0% 0

Row

Publication volume

Publication volume

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Citation impact

HÅLLBARHET, UTVÄRD. O STYRNING

Row

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 5.2 46.4 8.9 0.0 0.0%
2015 4.3 45.1 10.6 0.2 5.8%
2016 4.4 23.4 5.3 0.8 18.3%
2017 7.2 45.8 6.3 0.5 7.4%
2018 6.5 50.0 7.7 0.0 0.0%
Total 27.6 210.7 7.6 1.6 5.8%

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Cf Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 11.9 1.35 1.3 10.6%
2015-2017 13.8 1.16 1.1 8.2%
2016-2018 16.7 1.03 0.8 4.8%
2017-2019 21.7 0.87 1.0 4.7%
Total 33.6 1.04 2.3 6.8%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article, Proceedings paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 13 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 57.2%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 36 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 89.4%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Average field normalized citations (Cf)

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal impact

HÅLLBARHET, UTVÄRD. O STYRNING

Row

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Journal Cf Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 11.9 1.22 2.6 22.2%
2015-2017 13.8 1.12 2.6 19.3%
2016-2018 16.6 1.13 3.1 18.4%
2017-2019 21.5 1.06 3.3 15.5%
2018-2020 16.9 1.06 2.6 15.4%
Total 35.8 1.11 6.3 17.5%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 36 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 89.4%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Field normalized journal impact (JCf)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

HÅLLBARHET, UTVÄRD. O STYRNING

Row

Summary

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

Publication years Publications Swedish non-university co-publications Share Swedish non-university International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 36 9 25.0% 9 25.0%
2015-2017 49 13 26.5% 20 40.8%
2016-2018 60 17 28.3% 27 45.0%
2017-2019 72 25 34.7% 38 52.8%
2018-2020 58 21 36.2% 28 48.3%
Total 120 37 30.8% 51 42.5%

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 36 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 92.3%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and Swedish non-university co‑publication

Countries and organizations

Co‑publication countries

Co‑publication countries

Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
United States 14 9 5 0 0 2.6
Denmark 10 7 3 0 0 1.7
Australia 11 9 2 0 0 1.6
United Kingdom 12 7 5 0 0 1.6
Poland 8 8 0 0 0 1.5
Norway 10 9 1 0 0 1.5
Italy 9 5 4 0 0 1.3
Germany 8 4 4 0 0 1.2
Estonia 3 3 0 0 0 0.8
Austria 4 2 2 0 0 0.8
Netherlands 5 2 3 0 0 0.8
Portugal 5 4 1 0 0 0.7
Brazil 5 4 1 0 0 0.6
Finland 3 3 0 0 0 0.6
Czech Republic 5 3 2 0 0 0.5
Uganda 3 3 0 0 0 0.5
Pakistan 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
Viet Nam 3 3 0 0 0 0.4
China 5 1 4 0 0 0.4
Canada 2 1 1 0 0 0.4
France 3 2 1 0 0 0.4
Sudan 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
New Zealand 3 1 2 0 0 0.3
Switzerland 4 2 2 0 0 0.3
Lithuania 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
South Sudan 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Belgium 3 1 2 0 0 0.2
Ireland 2 1 1 0 0 0.2
Greece 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Spain 2 1 1 0 0 0.2
Slovenia 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Korea, Republic of 2 1 1 0 0 0.1
Mexico 2 0 2 0 0 0.1
Senegal 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Japan 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Russian Federation 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
South Africa 2 0 2 0 0 0.1
Singapore 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Hungary 1 0 1 0 0 0.0

Co‑publication organizations

Co‑publication countries

Organization Organization type Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
Swedish Environmental Research Institute Institute Sweden 17 16 1 0 0 5.6
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences University Sweden 13 11 2 0 0 3.2
Chalmers University of Technology University Sweden 15 15 0 0 0 3.0
Stockholm University University Sweden 11 11 0 0 0 2.7
Gävle University College University College Sweden 7 7 0 0 0 2.5
Södertörns University College University College Sweden 6 5 1 0 0 2.3
Norwegian University of Science and Technology University Norway 10 9 1 0 0 1.5
University of New England University Australia 8 8 0 0 0 1.4
Aalborg University University Denmark 7 6 1 0 0 1.3
Swedish Transport Administration Other Public Sweden 3 3 0 0 0 1.3
Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation (IUNG) Institute Poland 6 6 0 0 0 1.2
Environmental Law and Development Centre Sweden AB Company Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 1.1
Statistics Sweden Other Public Sweden 5 5 0 0 0 0.9
University of Tartu University Estonia 3 3 0 0 0 0.8
Lund University University Sweden 4 4 0 0 0 0.8
Institute for Applied Ecology (Oeko-Institut) Institute Germany 2 2 0 0 0 0.7
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Institute Austria 2 2 0 0 0 0.7
HWz Miljö & Ledarskap AB Company Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.7
Sweden Green Building Council (SGBC) Other Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.7
New South Wales Department of Industry Other Public Australia 4 4 0 0 0 0.6
Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE) Institute Finland 3 3 0 0 0 0.6
VTT Technical Research Centre Institute Finland 3 3 0 0 0 0.6
University of Cambridge University United Kingdom 3 3 0 0 0 0.6
Florida International University University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Makerere University University Uganda 3 3 0 0 0 0.5
Ecoloop AB Company Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI) Institute Sweden 4 3 1 0 0 0.5
Northern Illinois University (NIU) University United States 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
Universidade de São Paulo University Brazil 3 3 0 0 0 0.5
Open University University United Kingdom 3 3 0 0 0 0.4
Thai Nguyen University University Viet Nam 3 3 0 0 0 0.4
University of New South Wales University Australia 3 3 0 0 0 0.4
University of Newcastle University Australia 3 3 0 0 0 0.4
Västra Götalandsregionen Other health services Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.4
European Commission Other Public Italy 2 1 1 0 0 0.4
AMS institute Institute Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Anthesis Group Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
CSRA Inc.  Company United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Doctors Without Borders (MSF) Other health services Sudan 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Leiden University University Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences Other Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of British Columbia University Canada 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Northumbria at Newcastle University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
VU University Amsterdam University Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Aleksandras Stulginskis University University Lithuania 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Lithuanian Energy Institute (LEI) Institute Lithuania 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Starfish Initiatives Company Australia 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
ABB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
COWI A/S Company Denmark 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Doctors Without Borders (MSF) Other health services South Sudan 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Forestry Research Institute of Sweden Institute Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.2
IEA Bioenergy Task 38 Other Public Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research Institute New Zealand 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
National Institute of Economic Research Other Public Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Parthenope University of Naples University Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Politecnico di Milano University Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Sapienza University of Rome University Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Peshawar University Pakistan 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Volvo AB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag) Institute Switzerland 2 2 0 0 0 0.2
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Other Public Italy 2 1 1 0 0 0.2
National Institute of Agricultural Research (INRA) Institute France 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Oak Ridge National Laboratory Other Public United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Quaid-e-AWam University of Engineering, Sciences and Technology (QUEST) University Pakistan 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
RISE - Research Institutes of Sweden Institute Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
SOJA DE PORTUGAL Company Portugal 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Technical University of Crete University Greece 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
The Nature Conservancy Other United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Tyrens AB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Porto University Portugal 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Toulouse University France 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Catholic University of Leuven University Belgium 2 1 1 0 0 0.2
PE Accounting Company Sweden 1 0 1 0 0 0.2
Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute Institute Sweden 1 0 1 0 0 0.2
Swedish Research Council for sustainable development (Formas) Other Public Sweden 1 0 1 0 0 0.2
Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic Other Czech Republic 2 1 1 0 0 0.2
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ) Institute Germany 2 1 1 0 0 0.2
North Carolina State University University United States 2 0 2 0 0 0.2
Czech Technical University in Prague University Czech Republic 2 1 1 0 0 0.2
Appalachian State University University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation Institute Brazil 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Connora Technologies Company United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Cork Institute of Technology (CIT) University Ireland 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Czech Univ Life Sci NA Czech Republic 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Ecoinnovazione Srl Company Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Growth & Reg Planning Management NA Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Other Public United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Polytech Inst Coimbra NA Portugal 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
State Res Inst Institute Poland 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Catania University Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Manchester University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Tehran University Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Chinese Academy of Sciences Institute China 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Dalian Ocean University University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Institute of Forest and Agricultural Management and Certification (Imaflora) Institute Brazil 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
IQ Samhällsbyggnad Other Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Jagiellonian University in Krakow University Poland 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Linnaeus University University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Mid Sweden University University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
National Laboratory for Civil Engineering (LNEC) Other Public Portugal 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Tromsø University Norway 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Urban Planning Institute of the Republic of Slovenia Other Public Slovenia 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology University Germany 2 1 1 0 0 0.1
Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology (KICT) Institute Korea, Republic of 2 1 1 0 0 0.1
Coimbra Polytech Inst NA Portugal 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Cornell University University United States 2 0 2 0 0 0.1
Ericsson Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
IEA Bioenergy Task 38 Other Public Spain 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Inecol Institute Mexico 2 0 2 0 0 0.1
Int Energy Agcy IEA Bioenergy Task 38 NA France 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Riksbank Other Public Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Rutgers University University United States 2 0 2 0 0 0.1
University of Coimbra University Portugal 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Leeds University United Kingdom 2 0 2 0 0 0.1
University of Massachusetts University United States 2 0 2 0 0 0.1
University of Melbourne University Australia 2 0 2 0 0 0.1
University of Missouri University United States 2 0 2 0 0 0.1
Cheikh Anta Diop University University Senegal 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
OMEGA TECHNOLOGIE & SERVICES (OTS) Company Senegal 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Thies University University Senegal 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Karlstad University University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Kogakuin University University Japan 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Soc Org Learning NA Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Umeå University University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Gothenburg University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Uppsala University University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Urban Panaceas Company Australia 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Utsunomiya University University Japan 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Beijing Normal University University China 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Irkutsk Natl Res Tech Univ NA Russian Federation 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Technical University of Denmark (DTU) University Denmark 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Univ Campania Luigi Vanvitelli University Italy 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Auburn University University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Tsinghua University University China 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Aarhus University University Denmark 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute Institute United Kingdom 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN) Institute Germany 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore University Italy 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University of Rostock University Germany 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
European Satellite Services Provider (ESSP) Company Belgium 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Global Footprint Network Other Switzerland 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
National University of Singapore University Singapore 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
R2Water Research and Consultancy Company Netherlands 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (BiK-F) Institute Germany 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Teagasc - The Agriculture and Food Development Authority Other Public Ireland 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University College London University United Kingdom 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of New Hampshire University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of Siena University Italy 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of the Free State University South Africa 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of Twente University Netherlands 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Vienna University of Economics and Business University Austria 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Wageningen University and Research Centre University Netherlands 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Zhejiang University University China 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Bird Protection Netherlands Other Netherlands 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Butler University University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
California State University, Fresno University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Charles University in Prague University Czech Republic 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig Institute Germany 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Institute for Housing and Environment (IWU) Institute Germany 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
North-West University University South Africa 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Stellenbosch University University South Africa 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
The University of Waikato University New Zealand 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of Hawaii, Manoa University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of Queensland University Australia 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
BRANZ Institute New Zealand 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Budapest University of Technology and Economics University Hungary 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
École de technologie supérieure (ÉTS) University Canada 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Edinburgh Napier University University United Kingdom 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
EnergyVille Other Belgium 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
ETH Zurich University Switzerland 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Graz University of Technology (TU Graz) University Austria 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Groupe Ageco Inc Company Canada 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Hong Kong Polytechnic University University China 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Institute of Thermal Engineering (IGT) Institute Switzerland 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Paris School of Mines University College France 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
State University of Campinas University Brazil 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Texas A&M University–Commerce University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Tianjin University University China 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Treeze Ltd.  Company Switzerland 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of Minho University Portugal 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of Palermo University Italy 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of Seville University Spain 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
VITO NV Company Belgium 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
W/E consultants Company Netherlands 1 0 1 0 0 0.0

Open Access

HÅLLBARHET, UTVÄRD. O STYRNING

Row

Open Access publications, full counts

Open Access publications, full counts

Publication Year Publications Open Access publications OA gold OA hybrid OA green OA bronze Not OA Share OA
2014 15 1 0 0 0 1 14 6.7%
2015 13 5 2 1 2 0 8 38.5%
2016 17 7 4 0 3 0 10 41.2%
2017 28 14 5 3 5 1 14 50.0%
2018 23 10 2 1 6 1 13 43.5%
2019 23 19 7 7 5 0 4 82.6%
2020 17 12 9 2 1 0 5 70.6%
Total 136 68 29 14 22 3 68 50.0%

Row

Notes more…

The Open Access type of the publications was fetched from the Unpaywall REST API. The method to determine the OA type is presented here.

In summary, the different OA types can be described as follows:

  • Gold: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is fully OA.

  • Hybrid: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is not fully OA.

  • Green: The full text has been found in an institutional repository, such as DiVA.

  • Bronze: The full text has been found on a publisher website but no OA license could be identified.

N.B.: This table is based on peer-reviewed publications for which Unpaywall could determine the OA type (necessary condition: have a DOI number). Unpaywall’s method is empirical and does not strictly equate to copyright license. As a consequence, the OA status of a given publication may vary with time — for example turning from “Not OA” to “Green” when a full text is added to DiVA.

Row

Overview of Open Access publications - piechart

Stacked area chart for publications

Scopus

HÅLLBARHET, UTVÄRD. O STYRNING

Row

Citation Impact

Column

Citations, open window
Citations, open window
Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 5.4 224.9 41.3 0.0 0.0%
2015 3.5 138.4 39.3 0.0 0.0%
2016 6.1 92.0 15.1 1.0 16.5%
2017 7.2 117.6 16.2 0.0 0.0%
2018 6.5 83.3 12.9 0.0 0.0%
2019 8.3 45.7 5.5 0.1 0.9%
2020 4.2 12.5 3.0 0.8 20.0%
Total 41.2 714.6 17.3 1.9 4.6%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Conference Paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 12 (full counted) publications with good Scopus coverage (at least 82.1%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Average field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Publication years Publications Average FWCI Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 13.6 1.94 3.8 27.5%
2015-2017 15.4 1.66 3.4 22.3%
2016-2018 18.4 1.40 3.3 17.7%
2017-2019 21.6 1.18 3.1 14.2%
Total 35.3 1.47 6.8 19.3%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 41 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 85.1%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal Impact

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Publication years Publications Average SNIP Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 13.6 1.86 11.2 82.5%
2015-2017 15.4 1.56 10.6 68.6%
2016-2018 18.2 1.61 13.6 74.4%
2017-2019 21.4 1.63 14.9 69.5%
2018-2020 18.1 1.60 12.0 66.5%
Total 39.0 1.67 28.1 72.0%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 41 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 85.1%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Field normalized journal impact (SNIP)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
Publication years Publications Corporate co-publications Share corporate International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 42 3 7.1% 12 28.6%
2015-2017 55 2 3.6% 23 41.8%
2016-2018 66 3 4.5% 30 45.5%
2017-2019 74 4 5.4% 39 52.7%
2018-2020 62 5 8.1% 31 50.0%
Total 131 8 6.1% 57 43.5%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 42 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 82%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and corporate co‑publication

About

Row